Aller au contenu

Blog

Link Whisper Free vs Premium: pricing, AI features, and what you actually get

A source-based look at Link Whisper: what the free WordPress version does, what Premium adds, and what its pricing pages do not agree on.

Par la rédaction · Mis à jour le 7 oct. 2026

An open notebook on a dark wooden table with a hand-drawn mind map spreading across its two pages, one idea boxed at the center and lines branching out to notes around it, a phone at the edge of the frame.
Photo Jessica Lewis 🦋 thepaintedsquare on Pexels

L'article ci-dessous est publié en anglais. Chaque chiffre qu'il contient est le chiffre publié par l'éditeur lui-même, avec la date à laquelle nous l'avons lu.

This is a source-based comparison. We did not install Link Whisper, run a WordPress site with it, or measure ranking changes. Every figure below is what a named first-party surface printed as of October 2026, and each one names the page it was read from. What the surfaces disagree on is published as a disagreement, not flattened into one number. That is the same method the methodology page describes for the whole site.

Link Whisper is an internal linking tool for WordPress, with an AI-assisted suggestion layer on top. It is not a general-purpose AI product. The workflow it targets is a recurring maintenance task on content-heavy sites: deciding which of your own pages should link to which, then actually inserting those links.

The core loop is suggestions. The plugin analyses your posts and offers places to add an internal link, with anchor text already picked. You accept, edit, or ignore each one. That is the workflow the WordPress.org description sells: "AI-powered link suggestions right in your editor and a link health report," quoted from its own listing, checked as of October 2026.

Two reporting surfaces sit under that loop. A link health report shows orphan pages (posts with very few or no internal links pointing at them) and the link distribution across the site. Marketing material on the homepage adds a broad claim about the number of internal links generated, but that is a vendor counter with no published method behind it, so this article does not use it to make a judgment.

The WordPress plugin and the Shopify app are separate products. The Shopify app is not the plugin. It is subscription-priced, rated independently, and the two listings name different features. Reading the two as one product conflates a WordPress license with a different Shopify subscription.

The free version, listed as Link Whisper Free on WordPress.org, gives you the suggestion loop and the link health report. That is the published boundary. Premium adds bulk operations, automation, and deeper reporting.

A note on the boundary: the WordPress.org listing is written by the vendor, so "what Free includes" here is what Link Whisper says Free includes. The listing is not evidence about how well the features work, and this article does not treat it as such.

SurfaceFreePremium
AI link suggestions in the editorIncludedIncluded
Link health / orphan visibilityBasic link health report includes orphan pages and link distributionExpanded reporting and dedicated Premium workflows
Bulk add links with anchor textNot offered in the Free boundary described hereIncluded
Auto-linking from keywordsPremiumIncluded
Full broken-link and 404 reporting and repairNot established by this sourceIncluded
Target SEO keyword suggestionsNot listed as FreeIncluded
Cross-site linking suggestionsNot listed as FreeIncluded
Add, edit, delete links from reportsNot listed as FreeIncluded

That table reads the WordPress.org description directly. The listing explicitly names editor suggestions and a link health report as Free, and the health report is where orphan pages appear: the listing describes Free as "a link health report showing orphan pages and link distribution." The Premium section then separately marks the bulk, automation, advanced reporting, target-keyword, and cross-site capabilities used in the rows below.

The honest framing: Free is an evaluation surface. It shows you the workflow and enough of the reporting to judge whether the problem applies to your site. What it does not do is the bulk work. Bulk insert, auto-linking, broken link repair, and the deeper reports are the paid layer.

What the AI credits actually buy

Premium plans bundle AI credits, and the credits cover specific AI-assisted operations. Those include the automated runs the vendor's own changelog describes: orphan-page linking runs, inbound-linking runs, and what it calls "relation" runs, each with an estimated credit cost shown before the run starts. The credits are not, on the documented evidence, the meter for every core function of the plugin. The WordPress.org listing says Free includes AI-powered suggestions in the editor; separately, its Premium technical section says the one-click AI setup connects to Link Whisper's native engine without requiring manual OpenAI API-key setup. This article does not infer that every Free AI suggestion path uses the same no-key mechanism. Treat credits as a budget for the automated and AI-assisted work, not a master switch for the whole plugin.

The pricing page prints an annual allowance per plan. The table below reflects the pricing page surface as checked in this article; it is not presented as the only pricing Link Whisper shows, because a referral landing surface frames the same entry price differently (see below).

PlanAnnual priceSitesAI credits per year
Starter$97/year12,000
Growth$197/year33,000
Pro$297/year105,000
Agency$497/year5010,000

All four figures come from the pricing page, read as of October 2026. The page labels credits "refreshed annually" for each plan and "billed annually until cancelled."

When the included credits run out, the AI plan pricing page sells credit subscriptions: 1,000 credits for $10/month, 2,000 credits for $20/month, and an on-demand purchase of 1,000 credits for $20. The monthly plans renew with standard AI credits.

What the documentation does not say cleanly is how many credits one suggestion, report, or bulk run consumes. The WordPress.org changelog says credit "estimates" for orphan and inbound-linking runs were improved so the cost shown before a run is closer to what a run actually uses, which tells you the consumption model exists but the per-operation cost is not something this site can state from a source. We do not publish one.

Pricing: read the billing surface carefully

The pricing page prints two ways to read one price. Each plan card shows a monthly share (Starter at $8 per site per month, Growth at $5, Pro at $2, Agency at $1) and an annual total ($97, $197, $297, $497). On the cards themselves the plans are billed annually: the card text reads "billed as $97/year" and "billed annually until cancelled." The monthly numbers on the cards are the annual price divided across the year and sites, not a separate checkout option that the card names. This is the same two-figures-one-card shape we wrote down when reading an AI pricing page.

Two other first-party surfaces complicate the billing story. The pricing page's own comparison table lists Link Whisper's "Pricing model" as "Monthly or yearly plan," which is a different billing claim than the cards' annual-only wording. And a referral landing page frames the entry price as "$10/month" in its banner, while the Starter card on that page, as checked for this article, printed $8 per site per month billed as $97/year. Link Whisper does not serve identical pricing and billing copy across every surface, so this article scopes each figure to the page where it was observed rather than treating the referral page as a second canonical price card. Read each surface as stating only what that surface shows.

One thing the pricing surface does not reconcile with other vendor-controlled pages: the refund period. The current pages align on 14 days, and a vendor-authored plugin listing says 30. The next section explains which surface says what.

The refund wording is inconsistent across current vendor-controlled surfaces

On the surfaces checked for this article, the Terms of Use and the live pricing page agree. The Terms say money-back guarantees are "limited to the first fourteen (14) days of the initial purchase," and state in the same paragraph that "any references to other or different refund periods are out of date and should be ignored." They also say there are no refunds on purchases after fourteen days, none on renewals or subscription reactivations once payment is processed, and none on sales of credits or credit-based subscriptions. The live pricing page prints "14-Day Money-Back Guarantee" and, in the billing section, "14-day guarantee on initial licenses."

The WordPress.org listing does not match. Its FAQ states that if a buyer decides Link Whisper is not for them, "we will refund your purchase up to 30 days after your purchase." That is vendor-authored copy on a separate surface, and it is out of step with the current Terms. This article does not adjudicate which period applies to a given purchase. A buyer should treat the current Terms of Use as the definitive statement the vendor points to, and the WordPress.org FAQ sentence as conflicting vendor copy on a page that has not caught up with it.

WordPress Free is enough to answer one useful question

Before paying, Free can answer one useful pre-purchase question: does your site have the linking gap problem? The suggestion loop and the health report are enough to show orphan pages and link distribution across a real site.

The free scope is what the WordPress.org description lists, and it happens to be exactly the surface you would need to evaluate the workflow: see the suggestions the editor produces, see the health report, and judge whether the problem is worth fixing in bulk. That is, in plain terms, what a free tier is actually for: an evaluation budget, not a gift.

What Free does not tell you is the part that costs the subscription: whether bulk insertion and auto-linking actually hold up on a site your size. Those are Premium features, so the free evaluation can establish the problem but not the Premium solution. That gap is real, and it is why the paid tier exists.

What Premium adds

Premium adds the operations that make internal linking a maintenance task rather than a project: bulk adding links with anchor text, auto-linking from keywords, link editing across reports, broken link checking and repair, an orphan pages finder, target-keyword suggestions, and cross-site suggestions. All of these come from the vendor's WordPress.org listing, where each is marked as a Premium feature.

The one-click setup is the flagship claim: the plugin maps topical clusters with its own AI and fixes orphan pages in one click. That is a vendor claim about behavior, not a measurement. The vendor does make SEO-oriented claims in its own material: the WordPress.org description says the tool "makes it easier for Google to crawl, understand, and rank your content" and that fixing orphan pages "can have a massive impact on your rankings in Google." This article treats those as vendor claims, not measured outcomes, because it did not run a ranking experiment. Nothing here verifies a Google ranking effect either way.

WordPress vs Shopify

The two products answer the same underlying problem on different platforms, and they are not the same product.

The Shopify App Store listing describes an app that offers internal linking suggestions for products, collections, pages, and blog posts, plus keyword-based automatic linking, URL updating, click tracking, and broken link scanning. It is priced at $7/month for the Standard plan, with a 7-day free trial, and it carries a 3.6 out of 5 rating on 13 reviews. The WordPress plugin is a yearly license with an annual credit allowance and a different feature list.

Feature parity is not claimed here. The WordPress description is much longer and names features the Shopify listing does not. If your stack is Shopify, the comparison that matters is the Shopify app against other Shopify linking apps, not this WordPress plan table. And if your stack is WordPress, the $7/month Shopify price is a different product, not a cheaper version of the plan you are looking at.

The product design points at content-heavy WordPress sites where internal linking is done manually or not at all. As a content library grows, manual link maintenance becomes more expensive to keep current, which is where a suggestion engine and bulk operations earn their keep. This is an editorial reading of the product's shape, not a ranking claim.

It also fits publishers on Shopify who already manage products, collections, and blog posts and want suggestions for connecting them, with the caveat that the app's review history is thin and mixed.

Who should skip it

Link Whisper assumes WordPress or Shopify. A site on any other stack gets nothing from it.

Sites small enough that internal links are easy to keep current manually should probably skip it. If you can enumerate your posts and their links in an afternoon, the workflow the tool automates does not cost you much yet.

And anyone hoping the tool will create rankings by itself should skip it. The vendor's material does promise ranking-related outcomes, and this article does not treat those as verified. What a buyer can reasonably expect is a workflow that executes more internal links; whether that moves a position in Google is a hypothesis this article did not test.

Bottom line

A buyer on WordPress is paying for two things: bulk execution of internal links, and the reporting to see where the gaps are. Free establishes whether the gap problem exists, because the suggestion loop and health report are free. Premium changes the work from reviewing links one at a time to bulk insertion, auto-linking, and link repair. What remains unproven, from anything this site could verify from sources, is suggestion quality on a given site and whether the AI credits actually last through the year on a heavy content program. Those two questions are exactly where a trial with the product installed would earn its place.

Nous pouvons toucher une commission si vous vous abonnez via ce lien. Cela ne change jamais une note ni un classement.